“Justice delayed, justice denied” is a legal principle or maxim that highlights the importance of timely justice. It emphasizes that when legal processes are excessively delayed, it can result in a denial of justice or the negation of its intended effects.
One notable episode illustrating this principle in court law is the case of Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar, which took place in India. This case addressed the issue of prolonged pretrial detention and the resulting denial of justice. In the early 1970s, numerous individuals in Bihar were languishing in jail for extended periods without trial, some for durations greater than their potential sentences if convicted.
The Indian Supreme Court, recognizing that this delay contradicted the fundamental right to a speedy trial, held that the right to a speedy trial is an essential part of the fundamental right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. The court ordered the release of all undertrial prisoners who had been detained for periods exceeding their potential sentences. This landmark decision shed light on the necessity of expeditious judicial processes to ensure justice is not denied due to delays.
While this particular case highlights the concept of justice delayed, justice denied, similar concerns can arise in legal systems worldwide. Timely and efficient court proceedings are crucial in upholding the fundamental principles of justice and safeguarding the rights of individuals involved.
Marginalized voice 